AI-composited Idaho 4 memorial artwork showing representations of Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen beneath the gold IDAHO 4 title, with the Moscow landscape, water tower, clock tower, gold and burgundy frame, and Detective Chatter. Not an original group photograph.

At a Glance

Underlying event: The November 13, 2022 murders of the four University of Idaho students

Parties: Bryan C. Kohberger v. State of Idaho

Case number: CV01-26-15094

Petition filed: July 27, 2026

Court: Idaho district court, Ada County

Main question: Whether the guilty pleas and representation satisfied legal requirements

Next scheduled hearing: December 10, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. Mountain Time, concerning judicial disqualification

Status: Petition pending; original convictions and sentences remain in effect

About This Case

In July 2026, Bryan Kohberger filed a separate petition asking an Idaho court to grant relief from the guilty pleas and convictions entered in 2025. This is not a new criminal trial.

Kohberger alleges problems with his legal representation and argues that his pleas were not knowing or voluntary. Those allegations are for the post-conviction court to test. Filing them does not establish wrongdoing.

The court scheduled a December 10 hearing on his request to disqualify the judge. A scheduled hearing is not a ruling. His criminal judgment remains in place unless a court grants relief.

Read the post-conviction petition report

Idaho Four: Four Lives Before the Night at King Road

Kaylee: Ready for Life After College

Kaylee Goncalves grew up in Rathdrum, Idaho. At 21, she was in her senior year at the University of Idaho, studying general studies in the College of Letters, Arts and Social Sciences. She belonged to Alpha Phi. Friends and family remembered someone who spoke her mind, cared about people and was excited to see more of the world.

Kaylee was preparing to leave Moscow behind. Her parents said she expected to finish college early and had a job waiting with a technology company in Austin, Texas. She had bought a new vehicle and was making plans for the future. Her next chapter was supposed to begin soon.

One of the people Kaylee most wanted to share those plans with was Madison Mogen, whom nearly everyone called Maddie. They had known each other since sixth grade. They grew up near one another in northern Idaho, went through school together and eventually shared a college house. Kaylee’s parents said she had recently moved out of that house, at 1122 King Road, but returned to Moscow for the November weekend to visit Maddie and show her the new car.

That return visit explains why Kaylee was at King Road even though she was preparing to move on. She was not meeting someone new. She was coming back to a familiar place and a friend who had been part of her life for years.

Maddie: Marketing, Friendship and a Home in Moscow

Madison Mogen was from Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. Like Kaylee, she was 21 and a senior. Maddie’s major was marketing in the university’s College of Business and Economics. She was a member of Pi Beta Phi, and she had built a life in Moscow through classes, friends and work.

Maddie worked at the Mad Greek restaurant near campus. People who knew her said she was gaining experience with the restaurant’s social media, something that fit her marketing studies. She was working toward a degree while doing an ordinary job and spending time with the friends who filled her days.

Maddie lived in the King Road house with other students, including Xana Kernodle. Kaylee had been her roommate before moving out. The two friends stayed close, and family members described a friendship that went far beyond a college arrangement.

By Saturday, November 12, Kaylee was back in town. For Maddie, that meant another chance to spend time with her oldest friend. It did not mean every person who would later be in the house had spent the entire evening together.

Xana: School, Work and Her Own Circle of Friends

Xana Kernodle grew up in Post Falls, Idaho. She was 20 and a junior majoring in marketing in the College of Business and Economics. Like Maddie, she belonged to Pi Beta Phi. She was studying a similar subject, belonged to the same sorority and worked at the same restaurant.

At Mad Greek, Xana was part of the staff alongside Maddie. Friends and coworkers remembered her energy, sense of humor and willingness to make people feel welcome. She also had classes to attend and a life that extended beyond the restaurant and the house.

Xana lived at 1122 King Road with Maddie and other roommates. She was dating Ethan Chapin, another University of Idaho student. Their relationship meant Ethan spent time at the house, although he did not live there.

Xana’s path to King Road was different from Kaylee’s. Xana was a resident, building a routine around the university, work and roommates. She and Ethan had plans of their own that Saturday evening.

Ethan: A Freshman, a Triplet and Xana’s Boyfriend

Ethan Chapin was from Mount Vernon, Washington. He was 20 and one of triplets. His brother Hunter and sister Maizie also attended the University of Idaho. Family interviews described how closely the siblings grew up and how much Ethan enjoyed making people laugh.

Ethan was a freshman majoring in recreation, sport and tourism management in the College of Education, Health and Human Sciences. He was a member of Sigma Chi fraternity. At a school where his siblings were also students, he was just beginning his own college experience.

By November 2022, Ethan was dating Xana. He knew King Road because she lived there, but he was a visitor, not a tenant. Moscow police later corrected early reports that called him a resident.

On November 12, Ethan went to a sorority formal with his sister Maizie, according to her later interview with ABC News. He later spent time with Xana at the Sigma Chi house. That is where police placed the couple during part of their last evening.

Dylan and Bethany: The Two Other Roommates

Two more University of Idaho students belonged to the King Road household: Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke. They were not visiting for the night. Both were residents. Reporting based on property-management records listed them among the tenants of the six-bedroom rental. Their presence was part of the home’s ordinary college life well before November 13.

The group was connected through the university and its close circle of friends. Bethany belonged to Pi Beta Phi, the same sorority as Maddie and Xana. At a memorial, a letter from Bethany described Maddie as her sorority “big sister,” a relationship that meant mentorship and friendship. Dylan also appeared in photographs with other students from that social circle. The public record does not establish precisely who first invited each person to join the lease, so that detail should not be invented.

The two women shared meals, time with friends and the routines of a busy student house. Their later interviews described a group familiar with one another, not a set of strangers sharing rooms. Dylan and Bethany were at King Road on the final weekend and both survived. They were witnesses and people who lost friends. They were not accused of involvement in the killings, and their private lives do not need to become a separate investigation in this opening story.

Where the Four Stories Meet: 1122 King Road

These four separate stories came together through ordinary college relationships. Kaylee and Maddie had been best friends since childhood and had lived together. Maddie and Xana were roommates, sorority sisters and coworkers. Xana and Ethan were dating. Each relationship explains one more connection to the same home.

The three-story, six-bedroom rental stood near the university campus in Moscow. Maddie and Xana lived there with Dylan and Bethany among the other housemates. Kaylee had recently moved out and returned for the weekend. Ethan was visiting Xana. The six people present that night did not all have the same relationship to the house: some lived there, one had returned to see her best friend, and one was visiting his girlfriend. Dylan and Bethany survived.

Calling all four students roommates would miss what mattered. Maddie and Xana were residents. Kaylee was back visiting her best friend, according to her parents. Ethan was spending the night with his girlfriend. Their paths had converged at a familiar college house before anyone knew what would happen there.

About this reporting: University records confirm the four majors. Police timelines, family accounts and public reporting describe the students’ connections and living arrangements. See the Idaho Four Footnotes and the court document tracker for the underlying record.

Why It Matters

The students’ story ends in a tragedy, but the legal record did not end with Bryan Kohberger’s guilty pleas. This separate post-conviction proceeding asks whether those pleas and the legal help Kohberger received met constitutional requirements. It is a review of the conviction process, not a second murder prosecution.

Kohberger alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and that his pleas were not knowing or voluntary. Filing those allegations does not establish that they are true. The convictions and sentences remain in effect unless the post-conviction court grants relief.

This matters to the families and survivors because legal developments can affect the finality of a criminal judgment. It also matters to the integrity of the courts. Accurate reporting must distinguish a motion, a scheduled hearing, evidence admitted by a judge and an actual order.

Read the record: post-conviction petition.

Post-Conviction: The Guilty Pleas Under Review

A Separate Case After the Guilty Pleas

On July 2, 2025, Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, and to burglary. The judge imposed four consecutive fixed life sentences without parole and a consecutive ten-year burglary sentence on July 23. The original prosecution ended with a judgment, not a jury verdict.

One year later, on July 27, 2026, Kohberger filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The petition opened a separate proceeding, Bryan C. Kohberger v. State of Idaho, CV01-26-15094. The criminal judgment did not automatically disappear when this new case began. His convictions and sentences remain in place unless the court grants legally authorized relief.

What the Petition Alleges

Kohberger argues that he did not receive effective legal assistance and that the guilty pleas were not knowing or voluntary. His filings refer to alleged threats, promises, and how he understood the risks of a possible trial. Those are his allegations, not findings that his former lawyers or the court acted improperly.

Post-conviction relief has its own rules and burden of proof. The question is not whether a new journalist, family member, or online commentator would have made the same plea decision. It is whether Kohberger can prove a legal defect sufficient to justify relief under the applicable standards. The State contests his effort to undo the pleas.

What Happened at the 2025 Plea Hearing

At the plea hearing, Kohberger answered the judge’s questions and said he was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The court questioned him about the rights he was giving up and accepted the pleas. Those sworn answers and the written agreement are part of the record the State can rely upon when opposing his later claims.

The later petition does not erase that hearing. It asks the post-conviction court to consider whether the process leading to those answers was legally valid. That is an important distinction: a person challenging the voluntariness of a plea is not automatically entitled to a new trial simply because he now objects to the result.

The Documents About Understanding the Plea

Material that became public after the plea describes concerns raised by trial counsel in May 2025 about how Kohberger was processing adverse rulings and major decisions. The account of those filings distinguishes a concern about rationally assessing risks from an assertion that he was legally incompetent. His lawyers expressly denied that he was legally incompetent.

The defense had also sought more time for preparation before the plea. Those filings and the court’s responses are now relevant to his arguments about legal representation and understanding. The timing may be important evidence, but timing alone does not prove that the plea was invalid.

A careful account must put the defense submissions beside the sworn July 2025 plea colloquy, the written agreement, any response from the State and the later post-conviction filings. No one document establishes the entire dispute.

Challenges to the Judge and Court Location

In August 2026, Kohberger’s post-conviction lawyers asked to disqualify Judge Steven Hippler, who had accepted the guilty pleas, and asked for proceedings to return to Latah County. Those requests are separate motions. One concerns who should decide the petition. The other concerns where the case should proceed.

The State opposed the effort to disqualify the judge. The parties also disputed scheduling and the handling of confidential material. Filing the motions did not remove the judge, transfer the case, or establish that any earlier ruling was improper.

October 2026: An Important Scheduling Correction

An October 14 order vacated the October 15 hearing on judge disqualification. A separate notice filed October 29 set that matter for December 10, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. Mountain Time at the Ada County Courthouse in Boise. A hearing setting is not a decision on disqualification or on the petition itself.

An amended scheduling order also changed the litigation calendar. The reported dates include January 13, 2027 for amended pleadings, April 2027 for petitioner’s witness disclosures, May 2027 for respondent expert disclosures, and July 7, 2027 for discovery completion. The original documents should be used for exact deadlines and any later amendments.

Earlier June 2027 dates for a status conference and possible evidentiary hearing were vacated. A previously reserved date does not mean an evidentiary hearing is guaranteed. If a judge later schedules one, the actual notice, scope and result should be reported separately.

What the Court Can and Cannot Decide

The post-conviction court can address properly raised challenges to the plea process and representation. It may consider pleadings, evidence and arguments within the rules. The court has not, merely by allowing filings or setting dates, decided that Kohberger was mistreated or that his guilty pleas must be withdrawn.

If relief were eventually granted, the legal consequences would depend on what the judge ordered. Vacating a plea would not itself be a finding that Kohberger was innocent. If relief is denied, the original judgment remains in place, subject to whatever further review the law allows.

Where the Litigation Stands

The next verified milestone in the existing court record is the December 10 hearing on the request to disqualify Judge Hippler. The court’s signed orders, not predictions about what an argument might mean, will determine the actual next step.

For the families of Maddie, Kaylee, Xana and Ethan, and for Dylan and Bethany, the post-conviction litigation brings another period of uncertainty. Reporting can explain the legal process and still keep the people who lost their lives at the center of the story.

Primary Documents and Reporting

Read the dated record with its filing dates and distinctions between claims and rulings.

Legal status: Petition pending in the reviewed record. No order granting post-conviction relief has been verified here. A guilty plea is not a jury verdict; this proceeding has not produced a new jury verdict.

Complete Case Record

Latest From This Case

17 related published articles and court-record posts, newest first. Scroll to read older entries. This is a case-specific index; the full filing archive may contain additional records.

October 29, 2026 | Did New Witnesses Surface in Kohberger’s PCR? What the WSU Filing Actually Says

October 25, 2026 | Jason Goldman Speaks: What His Daily Mail Interview Really Means for Bryan Kohberger’s Guilty-Plea Challenge

October 14, 2026 | Kohberger Hearing Canceled, Deadlines Pushed Back: What Changed?

October 9, 2026 | State Opposes Kohberger’s Motion to Disqualify Judge Hippler

October 9, 2026 | With All Due Respect, Your Honor: Six Filings, One Footnote, And A Plan B

October 8, 2026 | Commentary: Can the Judge Who Accepted the Plea Hear the Challenge to It?

September 27, 2026 | What Did the Court Know Before Bryan Kohberger Pleaded Guilty?

September 26, 2026 | What Happens Next? Bryan Kohberger’s Post-Conviction Case

September 17, 2026 | Kohberger’s Family Backs His Bid for a New Judge and Return to Latah County

September 10, 2026 | Kohberger Responds to the Court’s Sealed-Memorandum Order

September 9, 2026 | State Responds to Kohberger’s Objection to the Post-Conviction Schedule

September 3, 2026 | Court Sets an October Hearing in Kohberger’s Post-Conviction Case

August 27, 2026 | Kohberger Asks to Return the Post-Conviction Case to Latah County

August 27, 2026 | Kohberger Asks to Disqualify Judge Steven Hippler

August 26, 2026 | Court Sets the Schedule for Kohberger’s Plea Challenge

July 29, 2026 | What’s Next for Bryan Kohberger? After His Request to Withdraw the Guilty Pleas

July 27, 2026 | Kohberger Files a Post-Conviction Petition

July 23, 2025 | Kohberger Is Sentenced to Life Without Parole

July 2, 2025 | Bryan Kohberger Pleads Guilty

Browse Post-Conviction archive.

What Happens Next?

December 10, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. Mountain Time: An October 29 court notice schedules a hearing in Ada County on Kohberger’s request to disqualify Judge Steven Hippler. This replaces the October 15 setting that was vacated. The hearing date is a scheduled event, not a ruling on the request.

Kohberger is asking the court to review the validity of the guilty pleas and aspects of legal representation. His arguments remain claims until the court decides them. Filing a petition does not undo the July 2025 convictions and sentences.

The next material developments will be signed rulings about judicial disqualification, the pending motions, evidentiary proceedings or other scheduling orders. A canceled hearing or new notice does not establish that post-conviction relief has been granted.

Both case-record panels scroll independently. Additional original filings are linked in the primary-record indexes.

Original Court Records

This is the separate Idaho proceeding challenging the guilty-plea process, not a second homicide prosecution. The filed petition, judge-disqualification motion, schedules and hearing notices have different legal purposes.

Explore This Case. Eight illustrated editorial hubs and eight source, court and case resources. The labeled regions open Idaho Four coverage.
The Faces Behind the Footnotes. Every name has a story. Gold cursive approved wordmark with heart flourish.

The four students’ families and the two surviving roommates remain part of the human story while a separate court examines challenges to Kohberger’s earlier guilty pleas.

Explore Idaho Four Biographies

Footnotes & Court Records

The source trail distinguishes signed judicial orders, party motions, the July 2025 plea record and the later claims about representation and understanding.

Open the Idaho Four Footnotes collection | Review this case’s source record

Approved October 24 burgundy and gold footer with Subscribe, Like, Share and Comment

Follow Faces in the Footnotes

Like this story

Leave a Reply