Maggie and Paul Murdaugh: Rights Through the Record

An Impartial Jury

The central rights ruling appears in State v. Murdaugh, Opinion 28329. The South Carolina Supreme Court found that improper outside influence denied Alex a fair trial before an impartial jury. It ordered a new trial.

The court described three steps. First, the defendant must show outside contacts serious enough to matter. The law then treats those contacts as harmful unless the other side shows there was no reasonable chance they influenced the verdict. The court held that the state had not met that burden here.

Read the May 13 new-trial ruling explainer for how the court applied those protections and why the decision leaves the murder and weapon charges pending.

Juror Privacy and Outside Influence

Rule 606(b) limits questions about jurors’ private discussions and mental processes. It allows questions about outside information or pressure. This protects the freedom to discuss a case while still allowing a court to investigate improper contact.

The Supreme Court found that the earlier hearing had wrongly relied on jurors’ own assessments of how outside comments affected their verdicts. The legal question required more than asking whether a juror believed they had been influenced.

Relevant Evidence and Unfair Prejudice

The opinion also addresses financial evidence. Some of that evidence could help explain the prosecution’s claimed motive. But the first trial included too much detail about other crimes, creating a risk that jurors would judge the murder charges on an unfair basis.

At the retrial, the state still must prove the murder and weapon charges. Separate financial guilty pleas do not prove those charges. The judge must decide which evidence the new jury may consider and for what purpose.

What This Ruling Does and Does Not Grant

The new-trial order returns the unresolved murder and weapon charges to the trial court. It is not an acquittal. The opinion does not accept every defense claim, identify another killer, or decide the later request to dismiss the indictments. Those issues must be read through their own filings and rulings.

Why It Matters

A fair-trial rule applies even when a case has received wide publicity or includes serious allegations. It protects the process used to decide guilt. That process matters to the accused, the victims’ families, and the public.

What Happens Next

The retrial court must apply the Supreme Court’s ruling while deciding later requests and preparing for a new jury. New decisions should be read in full before treating a party’s argument as a court finding.

Open the opinion and associated records · Return to the case