
Daniel Akers | Rights Through the Record
Source check: November 12, 2026
Rights Through the Record
Georgia’s presumption-of-innocence statute places the burden on the prosecution to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. Boles’s not-guilty plea leaves that task with the state throughout the trial. Georgia Code § 16-1-5.
The June jury-selection problem raised a concrete procedural concern: a prospective juror reportedly gathered and shared outside information. Court TV describes the panel’s dismissal. This record does not infer a further constitutional ruling from that report. Court TV’s June report.
Rule 10.2 separates the opening presentation from proof: counsel describe expected admissible evidence or its absence. That distinction explains why this case record labels each side’s opening account as an argument. Georgia Superior Court Rule 10.2.
The exact instructions given to this jury and the signed June orders remain necessary for a fuller analysis. General court guidance cannot establish that a particular instruction was delivered or that a specific legal violation was found.
See the outstanding-records list and the current case status.
Subscribe for new Faces in the Footnotes updates.