
Between the Margins | Jonathan McKinsey: The Danger of Guessing at Family Motives
The person behind a job title
Jonathan McKinsey worked in engineering and in technology education. He became a director for New York Times Games. His work was part of his life, and colleagues knew him through the systems he helped build. On September 26, 2026, he was fatally shot in Dublin, California. News accounts often gave his employer first. That does not tell the story of what his loved ones lost.
What police and prosecutors said
Authorities investigated a shooting at Dublin Sports Grounds and later charged Jonathan’s in-laws, Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen, with murder and related allegations. Prosecutors also described a lying-in-wait claim. These are accusations set out by the state. A charge tells readers what prosecutors intend to prove, not what a jury has already found. Both defendants have a right to challenge the case.
Family-court papers have another purpose
Reports referred to earlier disputes and documents from family proceedings. Such records may describe arguments or concerns among adults. They do not by themselves prove anyone committed a homicide. Civil and family-court matters use different rules from criminal prosecution. A newsroom should not lift a disputed sentence from an old filing and call it the motive for a murder.
Why a simple motive story is risky
The public likes a story with a beginning, middle and clear reason at the end. But police may still be testing timelines, interviews and physical evidence. A theory can change as information is collected. A dramatic explanation invented by a reporter could harm other family members and make the defendant’s right to a fair hearing harder to protect.
What the evidence may need to show
Prosecutors will have to establish the acts and mental state required by law. Evidence might include witness observations, security recordings or documents. Lawyers may dispute what a person said and how police obtained information. We should let readers know when a claim comes from a prosecutor, a witness or a judge rather than treating every sentence as the same type of proof.
Protect people who did not face charges
A family court record can involve many people, including children. Being mentioned in a document is not a reason to place someone under public suspicion. We should not publish private details just because the criminal case has drawn attention. Protecting people who are not accused is part of getting the story right.
Keep Jonathan in the first paragraph
Jonathan was a person with a career, skills and relationships. His death is the harm at the center of the case. When the newsroom reports each later hearing, the names of defendants and lawyers may change, but his life should not be reduced to the background of a courtroom contest.
Why It Matters
A family dispute and a criminal accusation are not the same thing. A fair article keeps those lines clear, remembers Jonathan and lets a court determine whether the charges can be proved.
What Happens Next
The court will address pleas, evidence, hearings and any later trial. Until a lawful verdict is entered, the murder and special-circumstance claims must be described as allegations.
Footnotes and Sources
- Alameda County District Attorney, official murder charging statement
- Associated Press, case and arrest reporting
- KQED, Jonathan McKinsey and family-court context
- Faces in the Footnotes, full case record
Editorial note: Original independently written source-led commentary. Charges, convictions, acquittals and pending legal arguments are identified separately. Everyone not convicted is presumed innocent.
Follow Faces in the Footnotes
Like this story